CASE STUDY · WILDEN
224 Lost Creek Court, Wilden
Listed at $1,389,900. Sold in 30 days after six months on the market.
The situation
Six months on the market, no sale. By the time the owners called me, most of the buyers actively looking in that range had already seen the house and decided against it. A long days-on-market number does its own damage too: buyers read it as a reason to wait rather than write.
So the question was never whether to put it back online. It was what had to change before I asked those same buyers to look again.
The plan
Fix what buyers saw first. New professional photography, aerial, a video tour and proper floor plans. I can’t tell you the old media was the whole reason it didn’t sell. I can tell you it was the part I could fix before relaunching, and that a buyer who already passed once won’t give you a second look on the strength of the same photos.
Relaunch it like a different listing. A home coming back after six months needs a different plan than a fresh one. We reworked how it was positioned and where it showed up, so the people who passed the first time had something new to react to.
Get it in front of more buyers than last time. The point was to create an actual second chance rather than assume the market would respond differently to the same offer.
The result
They accepted an offer within 30 days, and it completed shortly after.
One house doesn’t prove a rule. What it does show is that a stalled listing is worth diagnosing before it’s worth reducing. What did buyers see, what did they know, and what would have to change before they’d look again. Those three questions are where I’d start on any home that’s been sitting.
See how I approach a listing · Talk to me about yours
